How to contribute items missing from the Colnect Stamp Catalog

Collecting Stamps or generally interested in philately? You may write about everything here but better stick to subjects that relate to stamps and appeal to collectors. Mind you we have a separate category and forum for philatelic products.


Collector Avatar
DJCMH
Star Collector
帖子:3138
注册时间: 1 year ago
联系: 联系 DJCMH

How to contribute items missing from the Colnect Stamp Catalog

帖子DJCMH »

Recently there have been several collectors submitting items they say are not included in the catalog by using the "Improve Our Catalog" feature on a related (or sometimes even unrelated) item. This is not the correct procedure.

The "Improve Our Catalog" feature is only for correcting or improving information that currently exists on a stamp already in the catalog.

It is fairly easy to submit items that are currently not in the catalog for inclusion.

The online form you need to fill out is located here : https://nif.colnect.com/new/stamps

A step-by-step guide to filling out this form is located here (from the Colnect Wiki) : https://colnect.com/en/collectors/wiki/ ... Guidelines

And if you have any further questions or need assistance, please feel free to post questions here in this forum.

DJCMH

Stamp Catalog Coordinator


Collector Avatar
Tobben63
Junior Collector
帖子:30
注册时间: 1 year ago
联系: 联系 Tobben63

帖子Tobben63 »

I hope I have done it right with the stamps I have submitted to the Swedish catalog. And the Facit numbers I have submitted to existing stamps (except some errors that the fantastic editors or I have discovered)

I will continue to submit more to Sweden after a nice trip to Majorca. But maybe I must contact you DJCMH before I continue?

Regards

Tobben


Collector Avatar
DJCMH
Star Collector
帖子:3138
注册时间: 1 year ago
联系: 联系 DJCMH

帖子DJCMH »

@Tobben

No need to contact first, just go ahead and submit. If I do see any problems with an NIFiller I always leave a note on it (and you will receive notification on the NIFIller form page that there is a message)

DJCMH


Collector Avatar
walberg
Professional Collector
帖子:907
注册时间: 1 year ago
联系: 联系 walberg

帖子walberg »

Perhaps the hint in the comment box could be changed to red and bold to make it flashier (see screenshot).

Posts in the forums are only recognized by a small minority of collectors.

附件
imp.jpg
imp.jpg (39.97 KiB) 查看 3004 次

Collector Avatar
DJCMH
Star Collector
帖子:3138
注册时间: 1 year ago
联系: 联系 DJCMH

帖子DJCMH »

Good Idea @walberg I will send the suggestion in.


Collector Avatar
Dragosbor
Amateur Collector
帖子:106
注册时间: 1 year ago
联系: 联系 Dragosbor

帖子Dragosbor »

I do not agree with your decision , write improve CATALOG.

The goal of Colnect is it increase the number stamps not braking due to individuals.

The form should be for new stamps for different variants know what this means. The stamps is already on the Colnect, but it also exists--different value,perforation...

If the editor does not have a catalog ask for additional information without refusing comment. I know from experience.

Many stamps on Colnect is out of the picture but the data is.

LP


Collector Avatar
Steffen1601
帖子:3
注册时间: 1 year ago
联系: 联系 Steffen1601

帖子Steffen1601 »

I have also noticed that it seems like any submission is automatically rejected and responded to with unfriendly, rude comments. Maybe the responders should work on their people skills. Also, it is not easy to find links to submit missing items, so many users, including me, open the catalog and click on the “improve” button. Much easier than taking a long time to find the link. The unfriendliness of the administrators will cause me to cancel my premium membership.


Collector Avatar
walberg
Professional Collector
帖子:907
注册时间: 1 year ago
联系: 联系 walberg

帖子walberg »

The only problem is that people don't read the instructions. One click (see screenshot) - NIFiller will open, and you can add any new item or variant you wish.

附件
imp1.jpg
imp1.jpg (51.11 KiB) 查看 2889 次

Collector Avatar
Dragosbor
Amateur Collector
帖子:106
注册时间: 1 year ago
联系: 联系 Dragosbor

帖子Dragosbor »

What about the errors are found at stamps to Colnect (perforation, issued on...)- already warned.

It is guilty coordinator without catalog or sender data.

LP


Collector Avatar
MANOOK
Junior Collector
帖子:6
注册时间: 1 year ago
联系: 联系 MANOOK

帖子MANOOK »

hello, I would like to know what do I have to fill in "VARIANT" when it is a new stamp not listed in colnect ?

thank you

Frank


Collector Avatar
DJCMH
Star Collector
帖子:3138
注册时间: 1 year ago
联系: 联系 DJCMH

帖子DJCMH »

MANOOK 写了:1 year ago

hello, I would like to know what do I have to fill in "VARIANT" when it is a new stamp not listed in colnect ?

thank you

Frank

Variant is used when the stamp you want to submit is a variety of another stamp already in the catalog. That is, it is similar in design, but differs in a technical aspect (color, perforation, paper, watermark.)

The variant box on the NIFiller is where you put the copy and paste the URL of the main information page of the stamp that is already in the catalog.

Understand that variant is not a required field and NIfillers will be processed without the variant field being filled. Variant should ONLY be used if the new stamp fits the definition of variants I noted above.

DJCMH

Stamp Catalog Coordinator


Collector Avatar
mitanisch
Professional Collector
帖子:856
注册时间: 1 year ago
联系: 联系 mitanisch

帖子mitanisch »

DJCMH 写了:1 year ago
MANOOK 写了:1 year ago

hello, I would like to know what do I have to fill in "VARIANT" when it is a new stamp not listed in colnect ?

thank you

Frank

Variant is used when the stamp you want to submit is a variety of another stamp already in the catalog. That is, it is similar in design, but differs in a technical aspect (color, perforation, paper, watermark.)

The variant box on the NIFiller is where you put the copy and paste the URL of the main information page of the stamp that is already in the catalog.

Understand that variant is not a required field and NIfillers will be processed without the variant field being filled. Variant should ONLY be used if the new stamp fits the definition of variants I noted above.

DJCMH

Stamp Catalog Coordinator

According to this explanation, suspicions could arise that e.g. these two stamps would have to be classified as variants.

https://colnect.com/de/stamps/stamp/374 ... esrepublik

https://colnect.com/de/stamps/stamp/374 ... esrepublik

That is not the case.

The decisive factor for the fact that these are not variants is the printed value with an identical design.


Collector Avatar
DJCMH
Star Collector
帖子:3138
注册时间: 1 year ago
联系: 联系 DJCMH

帖子DJCMH »

To clarify - the designs should be EXACTLY the same, including the face value of the stamp and its variant

Mitanisch is correct the two stamps he shows are not variants of each other because they do not have the same face value.

To review : here is the information from the Stamp Contributions Guidelines Wiki regarding Variants :

https://colnect.com/en/collectors/wiki/ ... Guidelines

6.0 Variants, Related Items and Special

Most fields on Colnect are used to provide information about the stamp. The “variant”, “related items” and “special variant” fields are different and these fields are not for information purposes. They are there to support specific software features. To set up these software features properly editors must understand these features; why we have them, and how they are intended to work. Do not become confused by the philatelic definition of the word “variant” as that has nothing to do with the proper setup of these software features.

6.1 Variants

A “variant” on Colnect is a feature of the software that enables a user to conveniently find and display all similar stamps that might be confused with each other. This feature is to be set up to work well for all users, including novice users who are unfamiliar with stamp varieties. The feature works by linking all stamps which are similar looking. This of course includes all stamps that would fit within the usual philatelic meaning of the word “variant” and you are to link stamps that differ from each other by minor things such as perforation, paper, watermark, printing method, printing die types and so on. And if stamps are of a somewhat similar color, linking is also helpful (such as blue, linked with ultramarine, or light ochre with dull orange, and so on). But there are other similar looking stamps that are also to be linked; stamps which would not be called “variants” in the philatelic sense of the word. In general, you would not link stamps of different countries, but in some particular cases such as with joint issues, overprints, and/or surcharges it may be necessary to link these stamps because they are confusingly similar. And generally, you would not link stamps having different denominations, but again if there is a large number of stamps with a design that is very confusingly similar, even different denominations should sometimes be linked as variants. The question is not “are these stamps variants within the philatelic meaning of that word?”, the question is “are the stamps so similar that they could be confused with each other by a novice stamp collector?”.

6.1.1 : Overprints & Surcharges

A stamp with an overprint and/or surcharge is to be linked with the stamp that has been overprinted or surcharged as a “variant” if it is from the same country as the original stamp. If however the effect of the overprint and/or surcharge is to create a stamp of a different country the overprinted or surcharged is to be linked as a “related item” to the original stamp.

6.1.2 : Use of Name Field

Once “variants” are linked, how each stamp differs from the others should be made apparent in the “Name” field if possible, and also in the “Description” field. It is much faster to look at the Name or Description field and see one stamp is “Santa Claus - perf 12” and the other is “Santa Claus - perf 11” than to try to compare every single field until you find the difference.

6.1.3 : Use of Magnified Images

In some cases, adding a second image will also be helpful to show the different variations. A magnified second image is ideal when stamps have different printing die types.

6.1.4 : Make Sure There Is A Difference In One Category!

It should never be the case that stamps that are linked as “variants” are described in an identical way in all fields, leaving only the photo and catalogue codes to tell which is which. Not everyone uses a printed catalogue, and not everyone will rapidly see the difference in the photos. The difference should be pointed out in the “Name” field or the “Description” field, or both.

6.1.5 : Photos of Variants

If you are adding a photo of a “variant”, be sure to add a photo that is of that particular “variant”, and not a photo of the other variety if the difference between the varieties is visible from the front of the stamp, such as shade or perforation differences. Of course, in some cases such as with watermark variations, the same photo of the stamp can be used for both “variants”.

6.1.6 : Variant as a Software Feature on Colnect

Sometimes stamps are listed quite separately in the printed catalogues, and they are not actually variants of each other in any philatelic sense of the word, but they are still appropriately linked as “variants” on Colnect. This occurs because on Colnect the word “variant” refers to a software feature and it is not used as a philatelic term. By setting the “variants” you are setting up that software feature to bring together in one place all stamps that are confusingly similar.

6.2 Related Items

The “Related Items” feature is used to link items that are of a different type, but that are related to each other in some distinct way. For example, a stamp would be linked as “Related Item” to its first day cover. The original design purpose of the “Related Items” feature was to provide a mechanism to link items in the stamps category with items in the philatelic products category. That continues to be its main purpose. However, it can also be used to link stamps to other stamps if they are related but of a different format. For example, a stamp coming only from a souvenir sheet is to be listed as a “related item” to the souvenir sheet from which it has be taken.

6.2.1 : Variants are NOT Related Items

Do not use the “related items” feature to link similar stamps that might be confused with each other. Use the “variants” feature for that.

6.3 Special Variants

Saying that a stamp is a “special variant” on Colnect does not mean that the stamp is “special” or that it has any linked “variants”. And the expression “special variant” is not being used on Colnect as a philatelic term. The concept of a “special variant” is there to support a software feature. The feature that it supports is the ability to have two catalogues in one. For those people who would like colnect to be a highly specialized catalogue showing every esoteric variety of each stamp, it is that. And for those who consider all these varieties are just useless clutter and they want only a generalized catalogue, Colnect is that too. This is made possible using what has been called “special variants”.

6.3.1 : The "Show Special Variants" Setting

When you go to your Colnect page and click Personal Page (Edit) you end up at your user settings page. One of the settings on this page is a tick box that says "Always show special variants". If you have no tick in that box you will not see those stamps that have been tagged as "special variants". So, if you want a specialized catalogue you turn on special variants, and if you want a basic general catalogue you turn them off.

6.3.2 : Defining "Special Variant"

There is no hard and fast rule as to what must be tagged as a “special variant”. If it is something only listed in a specialized catalogue it is most likely a “special variant”. If it is an unusual variety such as an inverted watermark, a minor printing error, or an imperforate pair, it is usually tagged as a “special variant”. In all cases editors should use their judgment and experience to determine whether or not a particular listing belongs in the generalized catalogue or if it should appear only in the specialized catalogue.

6.3.3 : Other Uses of Special Variant

As mentioned above a “special variant” does not have to be a linked “variant” in colnect. Stamps can be designated as “special variants” even if they are not linked to anything else. For example, a pair with one stamp having an inverted overprint could be tagged as a “special variant” on Colnect even if there is no standard pair in the generalized catalogue to link it to. However, in such cases it is appropriate to link the special variant as a “Related Item” to the single stamp it is based on.


Collector Avatar
wrdekle
帖子:4
注册时间: 1 year ago
联系: 联系 wrdekle

帖子wrdekle »

I spent an hour and tried to fill in the online NIF form but could not submit because it could not recognize my Sakura catalog number for a Japanese stamp. I have the catalog in front of me and I know my number is correct but NIF does not accept it. Very frustrating. I gave up. Not sure I want to try ever again.


Collector Avatar
DJCMH
Star Collector
帖子:3138
注册时间: 1 year ago
联系: 联系 DJCMH

帖子DJCMH »

wrdekle 写了:1 year ago

I spent an hour and tried to fill in the online NIF form but could not submit because it could not recognize my Sakura catalog number for a Japanese stamp. I have the catalog in front of me and I know my number is correct but NIF does not accept it. Very frustrating. I gave up. Not sure I want to try ever again.

What was the error message that you received when you tried to process your NIfiller.

One common reason that NIFillers are not accepted is that the contributor has not filled out the color of the item (Color is a required field to be filled out by the contributor for the NIFiller to be processed). The result if color is not filled out is that the NIFiller was say that fields will be missing.

But there could be others, so let me know what the error message was that you received when item was attempting to be processed.

DJCMH

Stamp Catalog Coordinator.


回复

回到 “Stamp Collectors”